Skip to content
Mathematics

Really understanding fractions: beyond the pizza model

Why do fractions feel so hard? With examples, we look at where pizza slices fall short, the power of the number line, common mistakes, and ways to make adding, comparing and dividing fractions meaningful.

By Kuazara Bilim EkibiPublished: Updated: 11 min read

Top view of chocolate bars divided into squares on a dark background

Photo: Mae Mu / Unsplash

In this article · 7 sections

Fractions are where many students’ relationship with maths starts to go wrong. A child who is comfortable with whole numbers suddenly struggles to understand why 18\frac{1}{8} is smaller than 16\frac{1}{6}, why 12+13\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} doesn’t make 25\frac{2}{5}, or why dividing a number by 12\frac{1}{2} makes the answer bigger. In school, fractions are usually introduced with slices of pizza or cake. That is a good start, but on its own it is not enough. In this article we look at where the pizza model helps, where it gets stuck, and how to really grasp fractions as numbers. It is written for students, and just as much for the parents and teachers who want to help them.

How many different things is a fraction?

What we mean when we write 34\frac{3}{4} can change with the context. Researchers in maths education have long stressed that the idea of a fraction has several different, related meanings. The most important are:

  1. Part–whole: A whole has been divided into 4 equal parts and 3 parts have been taken. This is exactly the pizza model.
  2. Measure (number): 34\frac{3}{4} is a particular point on the number line between 0 and 1. It is a number, just like 2 or 5.
  3. Quotient: 34\frac{3}{4} is also the result of 3÷43 \div 4. If you share 3 pizzas equally among 4 people, each gets 34\frac{3}{4} of a pizza.
  4. Ratio: If a class has 4 boys for every 3 girls, the ratio of girls to boys is 3:43:4.
  5. Operator: When we say “34\frac{3}{4} of 120”, the fraction acts like an operation that transforms a number: 120⋅34=90120 \cdot \frac{3}{4} = 90.

The pizza model represents only the first meaning strongly. The problem is when a student starts to see a fraction only as “slices of something” and can’t think of it as a real number.

Strengths and weaknesses of the pizza model

The pizza model’s greatest strength is that it makes the idea of equal parts concrete. If you cut a pizza into four slices, one very big and the others small, the big slice is not 14\frac{1}{4}. Fractions are built on “fair sharing”, and slices show this nicely.

But the model gets stuck at several points:

  • Fractions greater than one: What is 74\frac{7}{4}? A pizza can’t have 7 quarter slices, so students usually have to draw two pizzas, and the idea of “the whole” gets blurred.
  • Comparing different denominators: Comparing 58\frac{5}{8} and 35\frac{3}{5} by drawing slices is almost impossible; the drawings look about the same.
  • Division: How do you explain “3÷123 \div \frac{1}{2}” with pizzas? For most students the model stops working here, and all that is left is the memorised “flip and multiply” rule.
  • The idea that fractions are numbers: A pizza does not show that a fraction has a place on the number line.

The number line: turning a fraction into a number

That is why many researchers and teaching guides recommend representing fractions on the number line as well. When you divide the stretch from 0 to 1 into 4 equal parts, the third mark is 34\frac{3}{4}. If you go past 1 and keep counting the same way, you reach 54\frac{5}{4}, 64\frac{6}{4} and 74\frac{7}{4}. Fractions greater than one are no longer strange at all; they are just numbers to the right of 1.

The number line also makes a powerful idea visible: between any two whole numbers there are infinitely many fractions. Between 12\frac{1}{2} and 34\frac{3}{4} there is 58\frac{5}{8}; between 58\frac{5}{8} and 34\frac{3}{4} there is 1116\frac{11}{16}, and so on for ever. Whole numbers have the idea of “the next number”; fractions don’t. This is an important shift in a student’s thinking.

The three most common mistakes and where they come from

Most mistakes with fractions are not random. Most come from applying rules that are true for whole numbers to fractions. In the research literature this tendency is called whole number bias.

Mistake 1: “8 is bigger than 6, so 1/8 is bigger than 1/6”

As the denominator gets bigger, the pieces get smaller. If you share a pizza among 8 people, you get a smaller slice than if you share it among 6. Thinking it through once with a sharing story lasts much longer than memorising the rule.

Mistake 2: “I add the numerators and the denominators”

Instead of repeating the rule to a student who writes 12+13=25\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{2}{5}, ask: “What is 12+12\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}?” The same method gives 24\frac{2}{4}, which is 12\frac{1}{2} again. Adding half a pizza to half a pizza and getting half a pizza makes no sense. This small contradiction gets the student to question their own method.

The logic of the correct method is this: we can only add the same units. We add 3 apples and 2 apples; but “halves” and “thirds” are different units. We need to convert them into a common unit, namely sixths:

12+13=36+26=56\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} = \frac{3}{6} + \frac{2}{6} = \frac{5}{6}

Mistake 3: “Multiplying makes bigger, dividing makes smaller”

With whole numbers (numbers greater than 1), multiplying makes the result bigger and dividing makes it smaller. But multiplying by 12\frac{1}{2} means “taking half” and makes the result smaller, while dividing by 12\frac{1}{2} makes it bigger. We will make sense of this in the next section.

Let’s think it through with examples

Worked example 1: Which is bigger, 5/8 or 3/5?

The first way is to use a common denominator. A common multiple of 8 and 5 is 40:

58=2540,35=2440\frac{5}{8} = \frac{25}{40}, \qquad \frac{3}{5} = \frac{24}{40}

So 58\frac{5}{8} is a little bigger than 35\frac{3}{5}.

The second way is to use a benchmark such as distance from 1. 58\frac{5}{8} needs 38\frac{3}{8} more to make 1; 35\frac{3}{5} needs 25\frac{2}{5} more. Since 38=0.375\frac{3}{8} = 0.375 and 25=0.4\frac{2}{5} = 0.4, 58\frac{5}{8} is closer to 1, so it is bigger.

This benchmark idea sometimes gives an answer very quickly. Let’s compare 78\frac{7}{8} and 89\frac{8}{9}: the missing piece is 18\frac{1}{8} in the first and 19\frac{1}{9} in the second. Since 19\frac{1}{9} is a smaller gap, 89\frac{8}{9} is bigger. No calculation needed.

Worked example 2: How many halves are there in 3?

Read 3÷123 \div \frac{1}{2} as a question: “How many 12\frac{1}{2}s are there in 3?” Every whole has 2 halves, so 3 wholes have 6 halves:

3÷12=63 \div \frac{1}{2} = 6

You can show this on the number line too: how many steps do you take from 0 to 3 in half steps? 6 steps. When division is thought of as “how many fit?”, it becomes obvious why dividing by a small piece gives a big result.

Let’s go one step further: what is 34÷18\frac{3}{4} \div \frac{1}{8}? “How many eighths fit into 34\frac{3}{4}?” Since 34=68\frac{3}{4} = \frac{6}{8}, the answer is 6. The “flip and multiply” rule gives the same result: 34⋅81=244=6\frac{3}{4} \cdot \frac{8}{1} = \frac{24}{4} = 6. But now we know why the rule works.

Worked example 3: The area model for multiplying fractions

To picture 23⋅34\frac{2}{3} \cdot \frac{3}{4}, draw a rectangle. Divide it into 4 equal columns with vertical lines and shade 3 columns; that is 34\frac{3}{4}. Then divide it into 3 equal rows with horizontal lines and mark 2 rows of the shaded region a second time. There are 3⋅4=123 \cdot 4 = 12 small boxes in total, and the number of boxes marked twice is 2⋅3=62 \cdot 3 = 6:

23⋅34=612=12\frac{2}{3} \cdot \frac{3}{4} = \frac{6}{12} = \frac{1}{2}

This model shows directly why the rule “multiply the numerators, multiply the denominators” is true: the product of the denominators is the total number of boxes, and the product of the numerators is the number of double-shaded boxes.

Equivalent fractions: different names for the same number

12\frac{1}{2}, 24\frac{2}{4}, 36\frac{3}{6} and 50100\frac{50}{100} are the same number. On the number line they all land on exactly the same point. This idea is at the centre of understanding that fractions are numbers. Multiplying the numerator and denominator of a fraction by the same number really means cutting the parts into smaller equal parts:

ab=a⋅kb⋅k,k≠0\frac{a}{b} = \frac{a \cdot k}{b \cdot k}, \quad k \neq 0

Taking half a pizza and cutting each slice in two doesn’t change how much pizza you have; it only increases the number of slices. Here the pizza model is useful again; the point is to use it not as the only tool, but as one of many.

Decimals and percentages: other faces of the same idea

For a student who has started to see fractions as numbers, decimals and percentages are not new topics but different ways of writing the same idea. If we read the fraction 34\frac{3}{4} as a quotient, we get 3÷4=0.753 \div 4 = 0.75. A percentage means “how many parts per hundred”; since 34=75100\frac{3}{4} = \frac{75}{100}, 34\frac{3}{4} equals 75 per cent. All three point to the same place on the number line.

When this connection isn’t made, students fall into whole number bias with decimals too. For example, many students think 0.250.25 is bigger than 0.30.3, because “25 is bigger than 3”. But 0.3=301000.3 = \frac{30}{100} and 0.25=251000.25 = \frac{25}{100}, so 0.30.3 is bigger. Reading decimals as fractions makes this mistake disappear on its own.

Some fractions can’t be written as terminating decimals. 13=0.333…\frac{1}{3} = 0.333\ldots repeats for ever. Students often find this surprising, and it starts a good discussion: fractions whose denominators have only 2 and 5 as prime factors give terminating decimals; the others recur. When students work out an observation like this for themselves from a few examples, the link between fractions and decimals stops being a memorised rule and becomes a discovery.

A few tips for parents and teachers

  • Bring fractions into everyday language: Recipe measurements, how much of a journey is done, or how much of a match has been played are natural chances to think of fractions as numbers.
  • Use the number line early and often: Ask students to place fractions on the line; ask “Is this number bigger or smaller than 1?”
  • Meaning before rules: Introduce rules like “flip and multiply” after students have seen what the operation means in a few examples.
  • Turn the mistake into a question: Instead of correcting a mistake straight away, have students try their own method on a simple example.
  • Start with an estimate: Questions like “Is 58+49\frac{5}{8} + \frac{4}{9} bigger than 1?” build number sense before any calculation. (Yes: 58\frac{5}{8} is 18\frac{1}{8} more than a half, while 49\frac{4}{9} is only 118\frac{1}{18} less than a half. The surplus is bigger than the shortfall, so the total goes past 1.)

A student who really understands fractions stands on much firmer ground later on with ratios, percentages, probability and algebra. For more examples, take a look at our maths articles and the maths topics. In Kuazara’s interactive fraction lessons you can split a whole into parts yourself and place fractions on the number line, so you understand the rules without memorising them.

Frequently asked

4 questions

Why is 1/8 smaller than 1/6?

The denominator tells you how many equal parts the whole is divided into. Dividing a whole into 8 equal parts gives smaller parts than dividing it into 6; that is why 1/8 is smaller.

How do you add fractions with different denominators?

First we convert the fractions to a common denominator, that is, to the same unit; then we add the numerators. For example, 1/2 + 1/3 = 3/6 + 2/6 = 5/6.

Why does the result get bigger when you divide a number by a fraction?

We can think of division as the question 'how many fit?'. Six halves fit into 3, so 3 ÷ 1/2 = 6; when we divide by a piece smaller than 1, the result gets bigger.

Is it wrong to use the pizza model when teaching fractions?

No; it is very useful for making the idea of equal parts concrete. But it works better when used together with other representations such as the number line and the area model, to show that fractions are numbers.

Sources

3 sources
  1. 1.Siegler, R. ve ark. (2010) — Developing Effective Fractions Instruction for Kindergarten Through 8th Grade, IES Practice Guide (NCEE 2010-4039)
  2. 2.Kieren, T. E. (1976) — On the mathematical, cognitive and instructional foundations of rational numbers
  3. 3.Wu, H.-H. (2011) — Understanding Numbers in Elementary School Mathematics, American Mathematical Society
  • #fractions
  • #number line
  • #equivalent fractions
  • #dividing fractions
  • #maths teaching

Related articles

All Mathematics articles